normal merge the branch to the main branch on remote.This setup I've shared above only works well if "everything goes the normal way". The challenge with Squashed or Rebased Branches Git fetch would prune remote references that do not exist (if you added that to your config file), and the rest of the command deletes local branches that have been merged. You can track a remote branch with the following command: When you create the same "header" branch on the remote repository, the local repository will not have any information about that branch until you tell the local branch to track it. This file will contain all the commits you make on that branch. git directory will be created with the following path: refs/heads/header. When you create a local branch, say "header", a new file in the project. How do you solve this? First, we need to understand how local and remote branches work together. Repeating this for many other branches leaves you with many outdated local branches. When you do this, you may forget to delete the local branch. On merging that branch, the branch becomes irrelevant, and GitHub, for example, gives you the option to delete the branch afterward. And when you're done with all the necessary changes for that branch, you would merge the branch to your production branch (like master). When you create a local branch, most of the time, you would push the changes in that branch to a branch of the same name in the remote repository. But, the more branches you have, the more difficult they are to manage. The idea of branches in git is a nice feature as it allows to work on separate parts of a project simultaneously.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |